Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the Microbicides Development Programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania

Allen, Caroline, F., Lees, Shelly, S., Desmond, Nicola, A., Derr, Geoff, Chiduo, Betty, Hambleton, Ian, Knight, Louise, Vallely, Andrew, Ross, David, A. and Hayes, Richard, J. (2007) Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the Microbicides Development Programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 83 6: 490-497. doi:10.1136/sti.2007.024810


Author Allen, Caroline, F.
Lees, Shelly, S.
Desmond, Nicola, A.
Derr, Geoff
Chiduo, Betty
Hambleton, Ian
Knight, Louise
Vallely, Andrew
Ross, David, A.
Hayes, Richard, J.
Title Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the Microbicides Development Programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania
Journal name Sexually Transmitted Infections   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1368-4973
1472-3263
Publication date 2007-10
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1136/sti.2007.024810
Volume 83
Issue 6
Start page 490
End page 497
Total pages 8
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher BMJ Group
Language eng
Subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Abstract Objectives: To compare coital diaries and face-to-face interviews (FFIs) in measuring sexual behaviour among women at high risk of HIV. To assess the effect of differing levels of support from researchers on reporting in coital diaries and FFIs. Methods: Three groups of 50 women were randomly selected from a cohort of food and recreational facility workers participating in a microbicide trial feasibility study and received differing levels of researcher support. Minimum support involved delivering and collecting coital diaries weekly; medium support included a weekly FFI and discussion of concerns; intensive support also included an unscheduled mid-week visit when diaries were checked and concerns addressed. All respondents participated in an exit FFI, including questions on sexual behaviour over the four-week study period and study acceptability. Results: Sexual behaviours were generally reported more frequently in coital diaries than weekly or exit interviews. Vaginal and anal sex, male and female condom use, vaginal cleaning and lubrication, sex during menstruation and sex with irregular and regular partners were reported more frequently in coital diaries than exit interviews. In coital diaries, level of support was associated with reporting of vaginal sex and cleaning. In exit interviews, support level was associated with reporting of vaginal sex, vaginal cleaning and sex with regular, irregular and commercial partners. Women with minimum support reported least satisfaction with the research process. Women with intensive support were most likely to report that they informed someone about their study participation and that they completed diaries daily. Conclusion: Compared with FFIs, coital diaries resulted in higher reporting of socially stigmatised activities, and sexual behaviour reporting varied less by level of support. More researcher support enhanced study acceptability.
Keyword sexual behaviour research methods
microbicides
diaries
HIV
developing countries
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Unknown

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences -- Publications
Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 19 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 18 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 11 Mar 2009, 10:18:10 EST by Ms Julie Schofield on behalf of Faculty Of Health Sciences