Archaeological residue and starch analysis Interpretation and taphonomy

Haslam, Michael Alan (2006). Archaeological residue and starch analysis Interpretation and taphonomy PhD Thesis, School of Social Science , University of Queensland.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
n01front_Haslam.pdf n01front_Haslam.pdf application/pdf 6.80MB 11
n02content_Haslam.pdf n02content_Haslam.pdf application/pdf 6.79MB 12
Author Haslam, Michael Alan
Thesis Title Archaeological residue and starch analysis Interpretation and taphonomy
School, Centre or Institute School of Social Science
Institution University of Queensland
Publication date 2006
Thesis type PhD Thesis
Supervisor Dr Marshall Weisler
Abstract/Summary Microscopic analyses of artefact residues and sediment microfossils follow a sequence of sample selection, observation, description, identification and interpretation. Each of these stages requires separate, but inter-related, methodologies contributing to the eventual published or disseminated results. Archaeologists are increasingly using residue and microfossil identifications and interpretations to discuss artefact function and site development, making inferences about past subsistence and other activities that in turn impact on broader debates about past economic and social practices. It is the contention of this thesis that the stages of archaeological microscopic analysis themselves require closer examination, as a means of assessing and progressing the viability of reconstructions drawn by residue and microfossil analysts. In particular, three components are examined: identification, taphonomy, and the underlying theoretical framework of residue and microfossil interpretation. These components are investigated using light microscopic analysis of ancient starch and stone-tool residues, with a focus on research conducted, and by researchers based, in the Australasian region. A selection of published peer-reviewed papers forms the central chapters of the thesis. These studies investigate archaeological starch identification and misidentification, ancient starch taphonomy (including decomposition, preservation and movement through sediments) and the value of social-archaeological theory in archaeological stone-tool residue analysis. The roles of analytical scale and narrative presentation are explored as one way of coming to terms with, and communicating the findings of, typically smallscale analyses that record the results of very specific past actions. Original introductory and concluding chapters contextualise the research within current and past trends in microscopic residue and microfossil interpretation. This discussion includes the influence of sample sizes over the validity of stone-tool residue analyses and the place of quantitative and qualitative approaches to archaeological sediment starch studies. Outcomes of the project include an emphasis on understanding taphonomic transformation of recovered residue and microfossil assemblages, recognition of the role played by identification in subsequent interpretation, and the contribution of an alternate theoretical and methodological framework for interpreting microscopic residues on stone artefacts.

Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 21 Nov 2008, 15:04:33 EST