Defining the enemy : a study of twentieth-century presidential rhetoric

Flanagan, Jason Constantine (2006). Defining the enemy : a study of twentieth-century presidential rhetoric PhD Thesis, School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, University of Queensland.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Flanagan_Full_thesis.pdf Full text application/pdf 2.94MB 10
Author Flanagan, Jason Constantine
Thesis Title Defining the enemy : a study of twentieth-century presidential rhetoric
School, Centre or Institute School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics
Institution University of Queensland
Publication date 2006
Thesis type PhD Thesis
Supervisor Joseph M. Siracusa
Dr Andrew Bonnell
Frank Zelko
Total pages 430
Language eng
Subjects L
780199 Other
430111 History - Other
Formatted abstract

This thesis examines the nature and evolution of enemy images in twentieth-century presidential rhetoric. It does so through five case studies, analyzing the presidential rhetoric associated with World War I, World War II, the early Cold War, the Vietnam War, and the first Gulf War. It works from three basic assumptions. First, that enemy images are an important area of study as they play a central role in the transition from peace to war, as well as in shaping the manner in which a conflict is fought and the form of the peace that follows. Second, that it is language about political events, rather than such events in any other sense, that most people experience, and political rhetoric thus constitutes political reality. And, finally, that of all the rhetoricians involved in American politics, it is the president who is the most influential architect of political reality.

Although scholars, most notably Robert L. Ivie, have offered important insight into the nature of enemy images in American presidential rhetoric, the existing secondary literature is generally based upon the analysis of small samples of rhetoric. While such an approach can produce valuable results, it ignores the fluid nature of enemy images and thus excludes insight into their development and evolution. Building upon the existing secondary literature, this thesis undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the speeches, press conferences and public messages of each of the presidents examined. Combining a traditional historical methodology with one resembling an approach Sonja K. Foss has labeled “generic description,” this thesis examines commonalities not only in the form of enemy images in presidential rhetoric, but also in the manner in which such images developed in response to events. Exploring how certain rhetorical forms were rearticulated in response to similar events in different time periods, it identifies what John Butler has labeled “rhetorical continuities.”

Keyword Rhetoric -- Political aspects -- United States -- History
English language -- United States -- Rhetoric
Presidents -- United States -- Language -- History

Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 21 Nov 2008, 14:29:25 EST