eResearch for Word users?

Peter Sefton (2008). eResearch for Word users?. In: , Proceedings of eResearch Australasia 2008. eResearch Australasia 2008, Melbourne, Australia, (). 28 September - 3 October 2008.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
era08_58.pdf Conference paper application/pdf 388.45KB 201

Author Peter Sefton
Title of paper eResearch for Word users?
Conference Paper Type Fully Published Paper
Conference name eResearch Australasia 2008
Conference location Melbourne, Australia
Conference dates 28 September - 3 October 2008
Convener Australian Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research
Proceedings title Proceedings of eResearch Australasia 2008
Publication date 2008
Abstract/Summary This paper documents the plight of 'average' modern researchers as they apply their academic writing skills in the new world of eResearch. We might expect researchers to have mastered some of the basic generic writing tools; an office suite with a word processor, the ability to generate charts from tables of data; a reference manager that can insert citations; and tools of their discipline like statistics packages. But the 'ordinary' researcher who tunes-in to the clamour about ideas and tools from a conference like eResearch Australia could be easily overwhelmed by the gap between the obvious potential and their own command of the technology they have to hand. Eight things to which a tuned-in researcher might aspire: (a) to share data with colleagues, (b) to collaborate on semantically rich documents which include appropriate data visualizations, (c) to blog their research as it happens, (d) to annotate data and works in progress, (e) to submit to journals, (f)to deposit appropriate copies of papers into various discipline and institutional repositories, and not just in PDF format, (g) in HTML, with rich interactivity and links to their data. They might also aspire to ensure (h) preservation of their data and their writing without accidentally choosing a doomed data format in which to store it. The question is how do we get there from here? The starting point is using Microsoft Word with references in EndNote emailed around a workgroup then sent to a publisher. The goal is to collaborate on a document which has embedded rich semantics, such as geographical data points that can be displayed on maps and overlaid with data from other sources. The document needs to be viewed on the web with interactive maps, and annotated, tagged and commented upon, as well as being distributed as a traditional paper paper and stored in the dreaded PDF file. Finally it must be automatically deposited in appropriate repositories, one of which is a publisher's review queue. Focussing on the writing process, this paper explores some of the aspirations listed above and suggests some practical advice for researchers and their support staff. There is a discussion at this point about the Integrated Content Environment – an academically focussed collaborative content management system, with integration into repository systems which can help with some of the aspirations of the modern eResearcher, but with a lot of work still to do. Other tools are also considered and found wanting. The conclusion suggests some more areas for research and development, targeted both at the Australasian context but also globally, to research funding bodies. How can our researchers get there from here?
Subjects 280000 Information, Computing and Communication Sciences
Q-Index Code E1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Unknown

Document type: Conference Paper
Sub-type: Fully Published Paper
Collection: eResearch Australasia 2008
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 258 Abstract Views, 202 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 26 Sep 2008, 13:59:45 EST by Patrica McMillan