Pleading classicism

Hyde, Dominic (1999) Pleading classicism. Mind, 108 432: 733-735. doi:10.1093/mind/108.432.733


Author Hyde, Dominic
Title Pleading classicism
Journal name Mind   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0026-4423
1460-2113
Publication date 1999-10
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1093/mind/108.432.733
Volume 108
Issue 432
Start page 733
End page 735
Total pages 3
Place of publication Oxford, U.K.
Publisher Oxford University Press
Collection year 1999
Language eng
Subject C1
440106 Logic
780199 Other
Formatted abstract
Akiba (1999) has sought to show that “[t]he logic of super- and subvaluationism can be regarded not as an alternative to classical logic but an extension of it. We do not need non-classical logic to understand vagueness”. Whilst I agree that there is a sense in which these logics can be so regarded, the issue of whether or not we should regard them as mere classical extensions remains open. The case for preferring classical logic over its non-classical rivals in attempts to understand vagueness remains to be made.
© Oxford University Press 1999
Keyword Philosophy
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 10 Jun 2008, 13:37:02 EST