THE_PM_BOK_CODE

Whitty, Stephen Jonathan and Schulz, Mark (2006). THE_PM_BOK_CODE. In: 20th IPMA World Congress on Project Management, Shanghai, China, (466-472). 15-17 October, 2006.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
_THE_PM_BOK_CODE.pdf _THE_PM_BOK_CODE.pdf application/pdf 65.29KB 60569
Author Whitty, Stephen Jonathan
Schulz, Mark
Title of paper THE_PM_BOK_CODE
Conference name 20th IPMA World Congress on Project Management
Conference location Shanghai, China
Conference dates 15-17 October, 2006
Journal name Proceedings of 20th Ipma World Congress On Project Management, Vols 1 and 2
Publication Year 2006
Sub-type Fully published paper
ISBN 978-7-111-04703-2
Volume 1
Start page 466
End page 472
Total pages 7
Language eng
Abstract/Summary This paper puts forward the argument that PM is spreading because it is a well adapted collection of memes, and that the Project Management Institute (PMI®) Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) version of project management (the PM_BOK Code) has more to do with the appearance of a capability for productivity than it does with actual productivity. It suggests that project management is evolving in a toxic manner, and that corporations will reap more benefit from it than people. The paper concludes with a call for a reformation of the PMBOK®.
Subjects 350208 Organisational Planning and Management
270707 Sociobiology and Behavioural Ecology
Keyword Project management
Impression management
Memetic
References 1. PIPC, Global Project Management Survey. 2005. http://www.pmportal.co.uk/uploads/documents/PIPCSurvey.pdf. 2. Kerzner, H., Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. 2nd ed. 1998, USA: van Nostrand Reinhold. 3. Hoyet, R., Improving Collaborative Skills with Hewlett-Packard’s Mission: Project Management. 2004, Hewlett-Packard Development Company. http://grants.hp.com/us/education/hoyet_paper_02282004.pdf. 4. KPMG, KPMG's International 2002-2003 Programme Management Survey. 2003: Sydney, Australia. http://www.kpmg.com.au/Portals/0/irmprm_pm-survey2003.pdf. 5. The Standish Group, Extreme Chaos. 2001, The Standish Group International, Inc. http://standishgroup.com/sample_research/PDFpages/extreme_chaos.pdf. 6. Blackmore, S., The Meme Machine. 2000: Oxford University Press. 7. Pfeffer, N., Theories in health care and research: Theories of race, ethnicity and culture. BMJ, 1998. 317(7169): p. 1381-1384. 8. Aunger, R., The Electric Meme: A New Theory of How We Think. 2002, New York: The Free Press. 9. Whitty, S.J. and M.F. Schulz, The impact of Puritan ideology on aspects of project management. International Journal of Project Management, in press. 10. Hauser, M.D., N. Chomsky, and W.T. Fitch, The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science, 2002. 298(5598): p. 1569 - 1579. 11. Whitty, S.J., A Memetic Paradigm of Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 2005. 23(8): p. 575-583. 12. Freidson, E., Professional dominance : the social structure of medical care. 1970, New York: Atherton Press. 13. Johnson, T.J., Professions and power. 1972, London: Macmillan. 14. Saks, M., Removing the Blinkers? A Critique of Recent Contributions to the Sociology of the Professions. Sociological Review, 1983. 31(1): p. 1-21. 15. Hodgson, D., ‘Putting on a Professional Performance’: Performativity, Subversion and Project Management. Organization, 2005. 12(1): p. 51-68. 16. Butler, J., Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory, in Performing feminisms : feminist critical theory and theatre, S.-E. Case, Editor. 1990, Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, Maryland. 17. Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 1959, New York: Anchor Doubleday. 18. Schlenker, B.R., Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. 1980: Krieger Pub Co. 19. Rosenfeld, P.R., R.A. Giacalone, and C.A. Riordan, Impression management in organizations: Theory, measurement, and practice. 1995, New York: Routledge. 20. Leary, M.R. and R.M. Kowalski, Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, 1990. 107(1): p. 34-47. 21. Jones, E.E., Ingratiation : a social psychological analysis. 1964, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 22. Arkin, R.M. and A.H. Baumgardner, Self-presentation and self-evaluation: Processes of self-control and social control, in Public self and private self, R.F. Baumeister, Editor. 1986, Springer-Verlag: New York. 23. Baumeister, R.F. and D.M. Tice, Four selves, two motives, and a substitute process self-regulation model, in Public self and private self, R.F. Baumeister, Editor. 1986, Springer-Verlag: New York. 24. Goffman, E., The presentation of self in everyday life. 1973, New York: Overlook Press. 25. Kiechel, W., Lies on the resume, in Fortune. 1982. p. 221-224. 26. Carnegie, D., How to win friends & influence people. 1999: HarperCollins. 27. DePaulo, B.M., Nonverbal Behavior and Self-Presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 1992. 111(2): p. 203-243. 28. Riordan, C.A., N.A. Marlin, and R.T. Kellogg, The Effectiveness of Accounts Following Transgression. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1983. 46(3): p. 213-219. 29. Wellington, C.A. and J.R. Bryson, At Face Value? Image Consultancy, Emotional Labour and Professional Work. Sociology, 2001. 35(4): p. 933–946. 30. Rosen, M., You asked for it: Christmas at the bosses expense. Journal of Management Studies, 1988. 25: p. 462-480. 31. Broussard, R.D. and D.E. Brannen, Credential distortion: Personnel practitioners give their views. Personnel Administrator, 1986. 31: p. 129-146. 32. Saunders, C.S. and B.A. Stead, Women's adoption of a business uniform: A content analysis of magazine advertisements. Sex Roles, 1986. 15(3/4): p. 197-205. 33. Fussell, P., Uniforms: Why We Are What We Wear. 2002: Houghton Mifflin. 34. Anderson, J.C., E.N. Johnson, and P.M.J. Reckers, Perceived Effects of Gender, Family Structure, and Physical Appearance on Career Progression in Public Accounting: A Research Note. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 1994. 19: p. 483–491. 35. AIPM, AIPM Salary Survey Report. 2005, AIPM. 36. Rosenfeld, P., R.A. Giacalone, and C.A. Riordan, Impression management in organizations. 1995, New York: Routledge. 37. Adler, J.E., Lying, Deceiving, or Falsely Implicating. The Journal of Philosophy, 1997. 94: p. 435-452. 38. Frankfurt, H.G., On Bullshit. 2005, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 39. Parker, I., Absolute Powerpoint, in The New Yorker. May 28 2001. p. 76-87. 40. Keller, J., Is PowerPoint the devil?, in Chicago Tribune. 2003. 41. Norvig, P., PowerPoint: shot with its own bullets. The Lancet, 2003. 362(9381): p. 343. 42. Weber, M., The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. 2002, Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company. 43. Roy, W.G., Socializing Capital. 1997: Princeton University Press. 44. Collins, R.K.L. and F. Abrams, Speech and power, in Nation. 1997. p. 11-19. 45. Sennett, R., The Culture of the New Capitalism. 2006: Yale University Press. 46. Ferrie, J.E., Labour Market Status, Insecurity and Health. Journal Of Health Psychology, 1997. 2(3): p. 373-397. 47. Ferrie, J.E., et al., The health effects of major organisational change and job insecurity. Social Science & Medicine, 1998. 46(2): p. 243-254.
Q-Index Code EX

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1307 Abstract Views, 60572 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 11 Apr 2007, 12:27:56 EST by Stephen Jonathan Whitty on behalf of Library Technology Service