Assessing the competitiveness of loss allocation methods in a deregulated electricity market

Lim, V. S. C., Saha, T. K. and McDonald, J. D. F. (2006). Assessing the competitiveness of loss allocation methods in a deregulated electricity market. In: , Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, Canada, (1580-1587). 18-22 June 2006.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
val-saha-pesgm06.pdf val-saha-pesgm06.pdf application/pdf 271.77KB 830

Author Lim, V. S. C.
Saha, T. K.
McDonald, J. D. F.
Title of paper Assessing the competitiveness of loss allocation methods in a deregulated electricity market
Conference Paper Type Fully Published Paper
Conference name IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting
DOI 10.1109/PES.2006.1708900
Conference location Montreal, Canada
Conference dates 18-22 June 2006
Proceedings title Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting
Journal name 2006 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Vols 1-9
Place published Piscataway, NJ, United States
Publisher IEEE
Publication date 2006
Volume number 1
Issue number 1
ISBN 9781424404933; 1424404932
ISSN 1932-5517
Start page 1580
End page 1587
Total pages 8
Collection year 2006
Language eng
Abstract/Summary This paper critically assesses several loss allocation methods based on the type of competition each method promotes. This understanding assists in determining which method will promote more efficient network operations when implemented in deregulated electricity industries. The methods addressed in this paper include the pro rata [1], proportional sharing [2], loss formula [3], incremental [4], and a new method proposed by the authors of this paper, which is loop-based [5]. These methods are tested on a modified Nordic 32-bus network, where different case studies of different operating points are investigated. The varying results obtained for each allocation method at different operating points make it possible to distinguish methods that promote unhealthy competition from those that encourage better system operation.
Keyword Loss allocation
power flow tracing
transmission flow allocation
Q-Index Code E1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Article # 1708900

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 221 Abstract Views, 830 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 29 Mar 2007, 15:19:10 EST by Tapan Kumar Saha on behalf of School of Information Technol and Elec Engineering