Local cooling for relieving pain from perineal trauma sustained during childbirth (review)

East, Christine E., Begg, Lisa, Henshall, Naomi E., Marchant, Paul and Wallace, Karen (2007) Local cooling for relieving pain from perineal trauma sustained during childbirth (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4: CD006304.1-CD006304.83. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006304.pub2


Author East, Christine E.
Begg, Lisa
Henshall, Naomi E.
Marchant, Paul
Wallace, Karen
Title Local cooling for relieving pain from perineal trauma sustained during childbirth (review)
Journal name Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1469-493X
Publication date 2007
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD006304.pub2
Issue 4
Start page CD006304.1
End page CD006304.83
Total pages 88
Place of publication Oxford, U.K.
Publisher John Wiley & Sons
Language eng
Subject 1110 Nursing
111006 Midwifery
Formatted abstract
Background: Perineal trauma is common during childbirth and may be painful. Contemporary maternity practice includes offering women numerous forms of pain relief, including the local application of cooling treatments.

Objectives:
To evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of localised cooling treatments compared with no treatment, other forms of cooling treatments and non-cooling treatments.

Search strategy
: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2007), CINAHL (1982 to January 2007) and contacted experts in the field.

Selection criteria
: Published and unpublished randomised and quasi-randomised trials (RCTs) that compared localised cooling treatment applied to the perineum with no treatment or other treatments applied to relieve pain related to perineal trauma sustained during childbirth.

Data collection and analysis: At least two independent authors performed data extraction for each study. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis where data allowed. We sought additional information from the authors of three trials.

Main results: Seven published RCTs were included, comparing local cooling treatments (ice packs, cold gel pads or cold/iced baths) with no treatment, hamamelis water (witch hazel), pulsed electromagnetic energy (PET), hydrocortisone/pramoxine foam [Epifoam] or warm baths. The RCTs reported on a total of 859 women. Ice packs provided improved pain relief 24 to 72 hours after birth compared with no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 0.91). Women preferred the utility of the gel pads compared with ice packs or no treatment, although no differences in pain relief were detected between the treatments. None of our comparisons of treatments resulted in differences detected in perineal oedema or bruising. Women reported more pain (RR 5.60, 95% CI 2.35 to 13-33) and used more additional analgesia (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.44 to 11.13) following the application of ice packs compared with PET

Authors' conclusions
: There is only limited evidence to support the effectiveness of local cooling treatments (ice packs, cold gel pads, cold/iced baths) applied to the perineum following childbirth to relieve pain.
Keyword Medicine, General & Internal
Randomized Controlled-trial
Vaginal Delivery
Postnatal Pain
Genital-tract
Episiotomy
Analgesia
Therapy
Labor
Gel
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 20 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 18 Feb 2008, 15:23:32 EST