Judging relationships between events: How do we do it?

Allan, Lorraine G. and Tangen, Jason M. (2005) Judging relationships between events: How do we do it?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 1: 22-27. doi:10.1037/h0087456

Author Allan, Lorraine G.
Tangen, Jason M.
Title Judging relationships between events: How do we do it?
Journal name Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1196-1961
Publication date 2005-03
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1037/h0087456
Volume 59
Issue 1
Start page 22
End page 27
Total pages 6
Place of publication Ottawa, Canada
Publisher Canadian Psychological Association
Language eng
Subject 1701 Psychology
Abstract A decade ago, Allan (1993) concluded that associative models provided the best account of data generated in tasks that require human observers to judge the relationship between binary events. In the intervening years, new data have been reported that provide evidence for higher-order processes. Some have argued that these new data pose a serious threat to the viability of the associative account. The purpose of the present paper is to review this evidence and to assess the severity of this threat.
Keyword Psychology, Experimental
Within-compound Associations
Retrospective Revaluation
Contingency Judgments
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ
Additional Notes Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
School of Psychology Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 17 Oct 2007, 13:28:01 EST