<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
  <title>Project Management Collection - UQ eSpace</title>
  <link>http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/</link>
  <description>The University of Queensland</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <generator>Fez </generator>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
   				  	      
		  <item>
	  <title>A Memetic Paradigm of Project Management</title>
	  <link>http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:8801</link>
	  	
	  	 <description>This paper aims to fuel the discussion on examining project management research from different perspectives. A new memetic approach to project management is presented that promotes a new way to examine the discipline of project management. Project management is claimed to be a memeplex with the language and stories of its scholars and practitioners at its core; shaping and restricting human behaviour, and creating impoverished mental models of project management. The paper suggests that a new memetic approach to project management will help lift restrictions imposed by the traditional research approach, and enrich our mental maps of project management to serve us better.</description>
	  	  	  	<pubDate>2006-01-03T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
	  					<author>
													Whitty, Stephen Jonathan
										</author>
															<media:content url="http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:8801/sjw_ijpm_05.pdf" type="application/pdf" />
							
  </item>
   				  	      
		  <item>
	  <title>And then came Complex Project Management</title>
	  <link>http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:13419</link>
	  	
	  	 <description>The subject of management is renowned for its addiction to fads and fashions. Project Management is no exception. The issue of interest for this paper is the establishment of the &#039;College of Complex Project Managers&#039; and their &#039;competency standard for complex project managers.&#039; Both have generated significant interest in the Project Management community, and like any other human endeavour they should be subject to critical evaluation. The results of this evaluation show significant flaws in the definition of complex in this case, the process by which the College and its standard have emerged, and the content of the standard. However, there is a significant case for a portfolio of research that extends the existing bodies of knowledge into large-scale complicated (or major) projects that would be owned by the relevant practitioner communities, rather than focused on one organization. Research questions are proposed that would commence this stream of activity towards an intelligent synthesis of what is required to manage in both complicated and truly complex environments.</description>
	  	  	  	<pubDate>2007-04-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
	  					<author>
													Whitty, Stephen Jonathan
				 og 													Maylor, Harvey
										</author>
										<media:content url="http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:13419/And_then_came_Complex_Project_Management.pdf" type="application/pdf" />
												
  </item>
   				  	      
		  <item>
	  <title>And then came Complex Project Management (revised)</title>
	  <link>http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:139105</link>
	  	
	  	 <description>The subject of management is renowned for its addiction to fads and fashions. Project Management is no exception. The issue of interest for this paper is the establishment of standards in the area, specifically the ‘College of Complex Project Managers’ and their ‘competency standard for complex project managers’. Both the college and the standard have generated significant interest in the Project Management community. Whilst the need for development of the means to manage complex projects is acknowledged, a critical evaluation show significant flaws in the definition of complex in this case, the process by which the College and its standard have emerged, and the content of the standard. If Project Management is to continue to develop as a profession, it will need an evidence-based approach to the generation of knowledge and standards. The issues raised by the evaluation provide the case for a portfolio of research that extends the existing bodies of knowledge into large-scale complicated (or major) projects. We propose that it would be owned by the practitioner community, rather than focused on one organization. Research questions are proposed that would commence this stream of activity towards an intelligent synthesis of what is required to manage in both complicated and truly complex environments. This is a revised paper previously presented at the 21st IPMA World Congress on Project Management Cracow, Poland.</description>
	  	  	  	<pubDate>2008-06-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
	  					<author>
													Whitty, Stephen Jonathan
				 og 													Maylor, Harvey
										</author>
										<media:content url="http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:139105/UQ_AV_139105.pdf" type="application/pdf" />
												
  </item>
   				  	      
		  <item>
	  <title>The impact of Puritan ideology on aspects of project management</title>
	  <link>http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:11452</link>
	  	
	  	 <description>This paper examines the impact of Puritan ideology on various aspects of project management. By using a memetic approach to project management research, this paper traces the development of the ethos or spirit of project management from its Puritan origins. It argues that contrary to traditional thinking, project management has developed against a background of Puritan elements (memes) that are favourable to the development of capitalism. Moreover, it is suggested that these religious origins continue to impact in a conservative way on how the project management discipline evolves; limiting its development, oversimplifying the process of managing people, and consequentially thwarting nonconformists.</description>
	  	  	  	<pubDate>2007-01-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
	  					<author>
													Whitty, Stephen Jonathan
				 og 													Schulz, Mark
										</author>
															<media:content url="http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:11452/sjw_mfs_ijpm_07.pdf" type="application/pdf" />
							
  </item>
   				  	      
		  <item>
	  <title>THE_PM_BOK_CODE</title>
	  <link>http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:13418</link>
	  	
	  	 <description>This paper puts forward the argument that PM is spreading because it is a well adapted collection of memes, and that the Project Management Institute (PMI®) Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) version of project management (the PM_BOK Code) has more to do with the appearance of a capability for productivity than it does with actual productivity. It suggests that project management is evolving in a toxic manner, and that corporations will reap more benefit from it than people. The paper concludes with a call for a reformation of the PMBOK®.</description>
	  	  	  	<pubDate>2007-04-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
	  					<author>
													Whitty, Stephen Jonathan
				 og 													Schulz, Mark
										</author>
										<media:content url="http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:13418/_THE_PM_BOK_CODE.pdf" type="application/pdf" />
												
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>